Developing a Digital Resilience-Based Curriculum for Students: An Analysis of Ontological Foundations and Cognitive–Behavioral Implications
Keywords:
Digital Resilience, Curriculum Development, Digital Education, Cognitive Competencies, Behavioral Adaptation, Ontological Foundations, Digital Citizenship, Educational Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Student DevelopmentAbstract
The present study aimed to develop a digital resilience-based curriculum for students through an analysis of its ontological foundations and cognitive–behavioral implications in order to provide a comprehensive framework for enhancing students’ adaptive capacities in contemporary digital learning environments. This study employed a qualitative exploratory design using thematic analysis and curriculum development methodology. The participants consisted of 24 experts from Tehran, including university faculty members in curriculum studies, educational psychologists, educational technology specialists, school counselors, and educational policymakers, who were selected through purposive criterion-based sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis of relevant scientific literature, policy documents, digital literacy frameworks, and educational technology standards. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-step thematic analysis procedure. To ensure trustworthiness, member checking, peer review, audit trails, and data triangulation techniques were applied. MAXQDA 2024 software was used to facilitate coding, categorization, and thematic synthesis. The analysis revealed that digital resilience is a multidimensional construct consisting of four interconnected dimensions: ontological foundations, cognitive competencies, behavioral competencies, and curriculum design components. The behavioral dimension emerged as the most influential domain, emphasizing self-regulation in online environments, responsible technology use, safe digital behavior, and coping with digital risks. The cognitive dimension highlighted critical digital thinking, information evaluation and verification, digital problem-solving, and cognitive flexibility as essential competencies for resilient engagement in digital contexts. The ontological dimension underscored the importance of human agency, adaptive interaction with technology, digital identity formation, and ethical responsibility in cyberspace. The final curriculum framework integrated educational objectives, learning content, instructional strategies, learning activities, and authentic assessment methods designed to promote digital adaptability, ethical awareness, critical thinking, and responsible participation in technology-mediated environments. The findings indicate that digital resilience should be conceptualized as a holistic educational outcome that extends beyond technological proficiency and encompasses philosophical, cognitive, behavioral, and ethical dimensions of student development. The proposed curriculum framework provides a theoretically grounded and practically applicable model that can support students’ ability to navigate digital challenges, adapt to technological change, and participate responsibly in increasingly complex digital societies. Integrating digital resilience into curriculum planning may contribute to improved educational effectiveness, learner well-being, and long-term adaptability in the age of artificial intelligence and digital transformation.
Downloads
References
1. Pan F. How Digital Support and Digital Competence Influence Digital Resilience of College Students in an Online Learning Environment. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1689767.
2. Zhang Z. The Role of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Chinese EFL Learners' Self‐Regulation, Resilience and Autonomy. European Journal of Education. 2025;60(2). doi: 10.1111/ejed.70127.
3. Zong Y, Yang L. How AI ‐Enhanced Social–Emotional Learning Framework Transforms EFL Students' Engagement and Emotional Well‐Being. European Journal of Education. 2025;60(1). doi: 10.1111/ejed.12925.
4. Ghanizadeh A, Yazdi MM. Resilience in Virtual Education: Designing and Validating a Scale in Higher Education. Exell. 2023;11(2):172-97. doi: 10.2478/exell-2023-0011.
5. Yang R, Gao Y, Ji Z. The Relationship Between Self-Regulated Learning, Mindful Agency, and Psychological Resilience in Chinese Master of Nursing Specialists: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066806.
6. Yu M, Wang H, Xia G. The Review on the Role of Ambiguity of Tolerance and Resilience on Students’ Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828894.
7. Xie C. Teacher Support Behavior, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and EFL Learner Resilience: A Study of Chinese Vocational Students in an EFL Context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning. 2024;10(3). doi: 10.5861/ijrsll.2024.024.
8. Wang Y, Zhang W. The Relationship Between College Students’ Learning Engagement and Academic Self-Efficacy: A Moderated Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425172.
9. Liu W, Gao Y, Gan L, Wu J. The Role of Chinese Language Learners' Academic Resilience and Mindfulness in Their Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916306.
10. Ahmed U, Ismail AI, Fati M, Akour MA. E-Learning During COVID-19: Understanding the Nexus Between Instructional Innovation, E-Psychological Capital, and Online Behavioural Engagement. Management in Education. 2021;38(3):107-19. doi: 10.1177/08920206211053101.
11. Lin Y. The Relations Among Foreign Language Anxiety, Academic Buoyancy and Willingness to Communicate in EFL Classroom. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1634054.
12. Fu J, Wang S. Unpacking Chinese Medical Students’ Well-Being and Its Relationship With Grit and Resilience. Sage Open. 2025;15(1). doi: 10.1177/21582440251314965.
13. Fang D, Zhao S, Wei W. On the Role of Perceived Teacher Support in Predicting EFL Learner Well‐Being in Artificial Intelligence (AI)‐Based Context: The Mediating Roles of Self‐Efficacy and Resilience. European Journal of Education. 2025;60(4). doi: 10.1111/ejed.70242.
14. Ma Q. The Role of Teacher Autonomy Support on Students’ Academic Engagement and Resilience. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778581.
15. Yu-xiu X. The Role of EFL Teachers' Self-Efficacy and Emotional Resilience in Appraisal of Learners' Success. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817388.
16. Lai ZC. The Impact of AI-Assisted Blended Learning on Writing Efficacy and Resilience. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. 2025;15(1):1-21. doi: 10.4018/ijcallt.377174.
17. Le Y, Liu Y. Emotional Multifaceted Feedback on AI Tool Use in EFL Learning Initiation: Chain-Mediated Effects of Motivation and Metacognitive Strategies in an Optimized TAM Model. 2025. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6289643/v1.
18. Wang F, Liu Y. Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between English Learners’ Motivation and Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915456.
19. Shi H, Gao J. Enhanced Well-Being in Second Language Learners: Unraveling the Roles of Emotion Regulation and Resilience. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1627834.
20. Zhang L, Wang Y. Reshaping the Resilience in Higher Education Based on Lower-Grade Undergraduate Students’ Performance in Literature Course During Covid-19. 2023:597-608. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-192-0_78.
21. Lou J, Xu Q. The Development of Positive Education Combined With Online Learning: Based on Theories and Practices. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952784.
22. Hedeshi E, Ghanizadeh A. Exploring EFL Learner Resilience and Examining Its Association With L2 Buoyancy and Language Achievement. Applied Linguistics Review. 2024;16(4):1885-905. doi: 10.1515/applirev-2024-0133.
23. Yu J. Using Autonomous Learning Mode to Improve Students’ Learning Willingness and Resilience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet). 2023;18(24):81-95. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i24.45641.
24. Lee J, Kwon KH. Promoting Sustainable Learning in the Post-Pandemic Era: Focused on the Role of Motivation, Growth Mindset, Self-Regulated Learning, Well-Being, and Smart Device Utilization. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):13247. doi: 10.3390/su151713247.
25. Shi YR, Sin KF. Exploring the Effects of Web-Based Psychological Capitals Training on Teachers’ PsyCap Development, Emotional Stability, and Support: Evidence From Chinese Inclusive Education. Plos One. 2024;19(9):e0306453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306453.
26. Kumalasari D, Akmal SZ. Less Stress, More Satisfied in Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Academic Resilience. Psychological Research on Urban Society. 2021;4(1):36. doi: 10.7454/proust.v4i1.115.
27. Mahama I, Danquah SO, Ammah C, Amos PM, Eshun P. An Examination of Mindfulness and Academic Resilience Among Higher Education Students Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic in Ghana. Psychology. 2023;14(06):974-99. doi: 10.4236/psych.2023.146052.
28. Tian F, Li F. Teaching Styles and Sports Engagement: Mediation by Satisfaction and Resilience in Chinese Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology. 2025;16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1630300.
29. Iliško D, Badjanova J, Leikuma-Rimicāne L, Vītola Z. Students’ Self-Efficacy and Resilience in an Online Environment in a Post-Pandemic. Language Culture Politics International Journal. 2024;1:81-97. doi: 10.54515/lcp.2024.1.81-97.
30. Ayasrah MN, Khasawneh MAS, Almulla MO, Aboutaleb AH. Design and Validation of the AI‐Integrated Metacognitive Learning Resilience Scale (AIIMLR Scale) for Secondary School Students in Jordan: Insights From the Network Analysis Perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2025;41(5). doi: 10.1111/jcal.70127.
31. Nair B, Khan S, Naidoo N, Jannati S, Shivani B, Banerjee Y. Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Pandemic Times: Bolstering Medical Student Resilience Through IPRMP and Gagne's Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240791.
32. Baisarinova A, Toleubekova R. Associations Between Resilience, Technostress and Reflective Capacity in Social Pedagogy Students: A Structural Equation Modeling Methodology. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research. 2023;10(4):761-7. doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5201.
33. Prickett T, Walters J, Yang L, Harvey M, Crick T. Resilience and Effective Learning in First-Year Undergraduate Computer Science. 2020:19-25. doi: 10.1145/3341525.3387372.
34. Crick T, Prickett T, Bradnum J. Exploring Learner Resilience and Performance of First-Year Computer Science Undergraduate Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2022:519-25. doi: 10.1145/3502718.3524764.
35. Atibuni DZ, Olema DK. Rurality and the “New” Post-Covid-19 Pandemic Education Culture: Facilitating and Inhibiting Resilience Factors of Academic Performance Among Learners From Low Socio-Economic Status Backgrounds in Rural Uganda. 2024. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.113813.
36. Mawila D. Growing Resilience Capacity for Learners Presenting With Specific Learning Disability in Learners With Special Education Needs Schools. African Journal of Disability. 2023;12. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1045.
37. Daw-as DM, Pelila JRO. Navigating Covid-19 Challenges – How Physical Education Teachers Skillfully Applied Their Expertise. International Journal of Physical Education Fitness and Sports. 2024:9-21. doi: 10.54392/ijpefs2412.
38. Asghar MZ, Arif S, Barberà E, Seitamaa‐Hakkarainen P, Kocayörük E. Support Through Social Media and Online Class Participation to Enhance Psychological Resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(22):11962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211962.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Parisa Masoudian, Nasrin Mohaddes, Parinaz Ahmadzadeh, Mehdi Akbarzadeh Sagay (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
