Exploring Teacher and Student Perspectives on Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative EFL Classrooms: An Iranian Context Study

Authors

    Hamid Reza Karim * Department of English Language Teaching, Frrhangian University, Tehran, Iran hrkarin@cfu.ac.ir
    Sarimah Shamsudin Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM International Campus, Jalan Semarak, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Keywords:

Form-focused instruction; communicative language teaching; EFL context; teacher beliefs; student perceptions; grammatical consciousness.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of Iranian EFL teachers and students regarding the implementation of form-focused instruction (FFI) within communicative language classrooms. This qualitative study was conducted in a private English language institute in Semnan, Iran. Participants included four EFL teachers and a group of upper-intermediate students aged 17–25 years who attended communicative English classes. Data were collected through semi-structured teacher interviews, classroom observations, reflective field notes, and follow-up validation interviews with selected students. Teachers implemented form-focused instruction techniques during communicative classroom activities over a two-week period. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework. Coding and categorization procedures were employed to identify recurring themes related to FFI approaches, uptake, corrective feedback, and communicative interaction. Trustworthiness of findings was enhanced through member checking, inter-coder agreement, and triangulation of interview and observation data. Ethical principles including informed consent, anonymity, and voluntary participation were maintained throughout the research process. The findings revealed that both teachers and students perceived form-focused instruction as a beneficial and necessary component of communicative EFL teaching. Teachers emphasized maintaining communicative fluency while selectively addressing grammatical forms and learner errors. Most participants favored reactive rather than preemptive form-focused practices because they considered them less disruptive to classroom interaction. Teachers also demonstrated preference for implicit instruction but acknowledged the importance of explicit metalinguistic explanations for adult learners when necessary. Students expressed positive attitudes toward integrating grammar instruction into meaning-focused communication and reported that corrective feedback contributed to language awareness and self-correction. Furthermore, the findings highlighted tensions between communicative goals and grammatical accuracy, showing that teachers continuously negotiated these priorities according to classroom context and learner needs. The study concluded that form-focused instruction can be effectively integrated into communicative EFL classrooms when implemented flexibly and contextually. Both teachers and learners recognized the pedagogical value of combining attention to linguistic forms with communicative interaction, particularly within EFL settings where exposure to English outside the classroom is limited. The findings suggest that successful FFI implementation requires pedagogical sensitivity, strategic corrective feedback, and adaptation to learner characteristics and classroom dynamics. Overall, the study supports the view that communicative language teaching and form-focused instruction should be regarded as complementary rather than opposing approaches in foreign language education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Xing Q. Pedagogical Review on the Learner-Centered, Communicative and Intercultural Language Classroom. Research and Advances in Education. 2022;1(6):86-93. doi: 10.56397/rae.2022.12.11.

2. Majeed NMA. Task-Based Language Teaching: An Efficacious and Innovative Approach to Develop Speaking Skills and Fluency of Esl Students. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research. 2022;5(2). doi: 10.52337/pjer.v5i2.524.

3. Muyesser M. Pragmatic Awareness and the Need for Greater Emphasis on Pragmatic Preparation in TESOL Programs. Tesol Journal. 2025;16(1). doi: 10.1002/tesj.70011.

4. Trương TNN, Noordin N, Ismail L, Yahya Y. Revisiting Views of Grammar and Grammar Learning Strategy Use: A Multiple Case Study in Vietnam. Language Value. 2022;15(1). doi: 10.6035/languagev.6124.

5. Harumi S. The Mediative Role of Learning Materials: Raising L2 Learners’ Awareness of Silence and Conversational Repair During L2 Interaction. Journal of Silence Studies in Education. 2023;2(2):145-62. doi: 10.31763/jsse.v2i2.79.

6. Alkhirbash A. Impediments to the Application of Communicative Approach: Survey Among Saudi University Teachers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2023;13(5):1310-7. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1305.27.

7. Alzhrani N. Positivist or Constructivist Paradigms in MA TESOL Programs: Developing a Knowledge Base for TESOL in Saudi Arabia. Heliyon. 2022;8(9):e10552. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10552.

8. Cheng L. The Implications of EFL/ESL Teachers' Emotions in Their Professional Identity Development. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755592.

9. Koç F, Savaş P. Supervision Models and Supervisory Feedback in English Language Teacher Education: A Meta-Synthesis Study Adopting a Discourse Analytic Perspective. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--Tesl-Ej. 2024;27(4). doi: 10.55593/ej.27108a1.

10. Zhang L. Turn-Taking in EFL Classroom Discourse. Review of Educational Theory. 2021;4(4):83. doi: 10.30564/ret.v4i4.3812.

11. Purwandari JD. The Roles of the F Move and Its Effect on Classroom Interaction. Epistema. 2021;2(1):51-8. doi: 10.21831/ep.v2i1.40512.

12. Tam NTD. Exploring Code-Switching Practices in Vietnamese Classrooms: an Introductory Investigation. Jolcc. 2024;2(2):147-62. doi: 10.61320/jolcc.v2i2.147-162.

13. Chong YS, Salehuddin K, Amzah N, Hamid BA. Triggered Code-Switching: A Bottom-Up Approach to Code-Switching Among L2 Teachers. Issues in Language Studies. 2023;12(2):246-63. doi: 10.33736/ils.5522.2023.

14. Chu J, Zeng X. The Role of the Negative 3-H Trio in Second Language Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736928.

15. Gandhioke S, Singh C. Learner Awareness of the “Music” of Spoken English—Focus on Intonation—And Its Impact on Communicative Competence. Is Intonation Teachable and Learnable? Creative Education. 2023;14(03):454-68. doi: 10.4236/ce.2023.143031.

16. Hani EA. The Function of Discourse Analysis in Improving Medicine Students’ Listening Comprehension: Cognitive Psychology Perspective in ESP Field. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research. 2023;11(1):13-25. doi: 10.37745/ijellr.13/vol11n11325.

17. Bhowmik S. Writing Instruction in an EFL Context: Learning to Write or Writing to Learn Language? Belta Journal. 2021;5(1):30-42. doi: 10.36832/beltaj.2021.0501.03.

18. Waluyo B, Apridayani A, Arsyad S. Using Writeabout as a Tool for Online Writing and Feedback. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--Tesl-Ej. 2023;26(4):1-18. doi: 10.55593/ej.26104int.

19. Călınescu A. Mechanics of ESL/EFL Writing Performance at the Tertiary Level. Eiki Journal of Effective Teaching Methods. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.59652/jetm.v2i1.102.

20. Rabab’ah G, Ma’touq AHM, Alghazo S. Discourse Markers in Narrative Essays: A Case Study of Jordanian High School EFL Learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature. 2022;14(1):203-17. doi: 10.47012/jjmll.14.1.11.

21. Zhang C, Kang S. A Comparative Study on Lexical and Syntactic Features of ESL Versus EFL Learners’ Writing. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090.

22. Evans J. Teaching L2 English With TED Talks: A Pedagogical Approach to Corpus Linguistics and Its Application to L2 Discourse. The CATESOL Journal. 2021;32(1). doi: 10.5070/b5.35925.

23. Shin Ds, Cimasko T, Yi Y. Multimodal Composing in K-16 ESL and EFL Education. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0530-7.

24. Altarawneh M. Native-Speakerism in the EFL Job Market: A Corpus-Based Study of Teaching Advertisements. 2023:105-16. doi: 10.24086/iclangedu2023/paper.947.

25. Mamnoun S, Nfissi A. Investigating Classroom Interaction From a Gender Perspective: A Comprehensive Review of Relevant Studies. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices. 2023;5(2):17-27. doi: 10.32996/jweep.2023.5.2.3.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Submitted

2026-01-08

Revised

2026-05-08

Accepted

2026-05-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Karim, H. R., & Shamsudin, S. . (2026). Exploring Teacher and Student Perspectives on Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative EFL Classrooms: An Iranian Context Study. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1-13. https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/261

Similar Articles

11-20 of 196

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.