Identification and Prioritization of Contextual Factors Influencing the Improvement of Continuous Training for Employees in Universities of Baghdad Province

Authors

    Farah Khairullah Fawwaz Al Hiani Phd Student, Department of Educational Management, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran .
    Mohammad Hosseinpour * Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Ahv.C., Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. Hosseinpour6@iau.ac.ir
    Muneer Fakhri Saleh Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Al-Isra University, Baghdad, Iraq .
    Narges Saeidian Khorasghani Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Keywords:

 continuous training, university employees, contextual factors, professional development

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify and prioritize the contextual factors influencing the improvement of continuous training for employees in universities of Baghdad Province. The research was applied in terms of purpose and exploratory in terms of methodology. Grounded theory was employed to identify and prioritize the contextual factors affecting the enhancement of continuous training. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 selected academic experts using the snowball sampling method. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The findings revealed that contextual factors play a pivotal role in facilitating and enhancing the effectiveness of continuous training programs and were hierarchically classified according to their importance and influence. At the top of this hierarchy was managerial support and leadership, which, by fostering a motivational, supportive, and participatory atmosphere, plays a fundamental role in encouraging employees to actively engage in learning processes. The second-ranked factor was the university’s supportive infrastructure and resources; access to equipment, financial resources, and modern educational technologies significantly strengthens employees’ ability to benefit from training initiatives. The third most important factor was organizational culture and employees’ attitudes toward learning, which facilitates the acceptance of continuous learning and feedback, contributing to the creation of a dynamic and learning-oriented environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Duke C, Hinzen H. Youth and adult education within lifelong learning: Claims and challenges. Development. 2010;53(4):465-70. doi: 10.1057/dev.2010.67.

2. Candy P, Crebert G, O'Leary J. Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education: NBEET commissioned report. Canberra: AGPS; 1994.

3. Ellinger AD. The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2004;6(2):158-77. doi: 10.1177/1523422304263327.

4. Super DE, Savickas ML, Super CM. The life-Span, life-Space approach to careers. In: Brown D, Brooks L, editors. Career Choice & Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.

5. Ali BJ, Ismail FB, Hamawandy NM, Abdul Kareem F, Fattah JJ, Majid AA, et al. Organizational culture effect in the relationship between training development and academic performance in the public Iraqi universities. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management. 2025;10(21s). doi: 10.52783/jisem.v10i21s.3406.

6. Dakhil ZA, Skuk M, Al-Jorani M. Challenges faced by Iraqi academics in career advancement and promotion: A survey-based study. Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences. 2024;17(1):107-21. doi: 10.3167/latiss.2024.170106.

7. Anderson Jr EG, Lewis K. A dynamic model of individual and collective learning amid disruption. Organization Science. 2014;25(2):356-76. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0854.

8. McCray J, Warwick R, Palmer A. Impressions of action and critical action learning: exploring the leadership development of senior doctors in an English healthcare organization. International Journal of Training and Development. 2018;22(1):69-85. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12119.

9. Lohman MC. Cultivating problem-solving skills through problem-based approaches to professional development. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2002;13(3):243-63. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1029.

10. Hagermoser Sanetti LM, Williamson KM, Long AC, Kratochwill TR. Increasing in-service teacher implementation of classroom management practices through consultation, implementation planning, and participant modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2018;20(1):43-59. doi: 10.1177/1098300717722357.

11. Popescu AI. Essentials of university strategy development in the field of lifelong learning. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2012;4(1):31-44.

12. Akhmedov BA. Innovative cluster model for improving the quality of education. Academic Research in Educational Sciences. 2021;2(3):528-34.

13. Ebadi A, Vanaki Z, Nahrir B, Hekmatpou D. Pathology of continuing educational programs in Iran medical society. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2008;4(2):140-5.

14. Sadeghitabar P, Shariatmadari M. Identifying the Dimensions and Components of Continuing Medical Education Based on Blended Learning with a Sustainable Development Approach. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development Quarterly. 2020;9(2):63-82.

15. Ataei M, Safarian Hamadani S, Zameni F. Presenting an Effective Teaching Model in Continuing Medical Education Programs. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2019;29(176):202-7.

16. Sheikhi Alizadeh M, Hosseinpour M, Bahmaee L. Identifying Factors Affecting the Development of Continuing Medical Education at the University of Medical Sciences. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences (Iran University of Medical Sciences Journal). 2022;29(8):119-27.

17. Buendia A, Morales C. A new educational paradigm for evolving development. World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution. 2003;59(8):561-8. doi: 10.1080/713747093.

18. Farstakhah M. Under the skin of Iran's humanities, the duel between activists and structures. Two Quarterly Journals of Humanities Development. 2020;2(4):5-18.

19. Dewi Mallarangan AD, Rahman A, Nur S, Khusnul Lathifah Z, Lubis FM. Analysis of the influence of continuous training development and education on professional competence of teachers in public schools. Organization Science. 2024;6(2):13449-56.

20. Yousefi Z, Imani MT, Jahed H. Prioritizing the Dimensions, Components, and Indicators for Enhancing the Effectiveness of In-Service Training Courses for the Central Staff of the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education. Health and Treatment Management. 2023.

21. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. In: nd, editor. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Submitted

2025-07-14

Revised

2025-11-02

Accepted

2025-11-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Al Hiani, F. K. F. ., Hosseinpour, M., Fakhri Saleh, M. ., & Saeidian Khorasghani , N. . (2026). Identification and Prioritization of Contextual Factors Influencing the Improvement of Continuous Training for Employees in Universities of Baghdad Province. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1-14. https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/149

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 125

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.