<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3092-717X</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 6</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Digital Formative Assessment Strategies in  Blended Learning Contexts: A Qualitative  Case Study</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Digital Formative Assessment Strategies in  Blended Learning Contexts: A Qualitative  Case Study</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>9</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to explore the strategies employed by educators to implement digital formative&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;assessment in blended learning contexts, focusing on pedagogical intentions, technological affordances,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;and professional practices. A qualitative case study design was utilized, involving semi-structured&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;interviews with 26 educators from secondary and post-secondary institutions in Tehran who have&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;experience with blended learning. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;diversity in subject areas and teaching backgrounds. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;was achieved. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis, supported&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;by Nvivo software to code, organize, and identify patterns in the data. Three main themes emerged from&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;the analysis: (1) Pedagogical Intentions and Design, emphasizing the alignment of assessments with&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;learning objectives, differentiation, timely feedback, integration within instructional cycles, and&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;scaffolding for metacognition; (2) Digital Tools and Technological Affordances, highlighting the&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;importance of platform functionality, interactive features, data analytics, accessibility, and tool selection&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;criteria; and (3) Teacher Beliefs and Professional Practices, including attitudes towards digital&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;assessment, assessment literacy, peer collaboration, implementation challenges, and ethical&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;considerations. Teachers recognized digital assessment as enhancing personalization, engagement, and&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;feedback timeliness but also identified challenges such as technological limitations and equity concerns.&lt;br&gt;Digital formative assessment strategies in blended learning environments present significant&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;opportunities for supporting student learning, fostering metacognitive skills, and providing timely,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;actionable feedback. However, effective implementation requires careful alignment with pedagogical&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;objectives, attention to accessibility and ethical concerns, and robust professional development for&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;educators. Addressing persistent challenges in technology and equity will be critical for maximizing the&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;potential of digital formative assessment.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Digital formative assessment</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">blended learning</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">feedback</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">educational technology</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">teacher  beliefs</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">qualitative research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">metacognition</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">assessment literacy</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/download/43/36</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
