<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3092-717X</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 15</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Task Modality and Vocabulary Development in Content-Based EFL Tasks: A Mixed-Methods Study of Oral and Written Performance</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Task Modality and Vocabulary Development in Content-Based EFL Tasks: A Mixed-Methods Study of Oral and Written Performance</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>13</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/japes.198</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>30</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This mixed-methods study investigates the impact of task modality, oral versus written, on vocabulary performance in content-based, task-driven activities among intermediate EFL learners. Forty participants completed two problem-solving tasks, describing a science experiment and analyzing an environmental scenario, in both oral and written forms. The study addressed four research questions examining lexical richness, lexical accuracy, lexical appropriateness, and the vocabulary-related strategies learners employ when performing oral and written versions of the same tasks. Vocabulary output was analyzed using quantitative measures of lexical performance alongside qualitative analysis of learners’ modality-specific strategies. Results indicate that written tasks elicited significantly higher lexical richness and more precise, contextually appropriate vocabulary, whereas oral tasks favored fluency and greater reliance on high-frequency, familiar items. Qualitative findings further reveal that learners tended to use repetition and retrieval-based strategies during oral production but engaged in lexical experimentation and strategic refinement in writing. Interpreted through cognitive SLA and task-based learning frameworks, these findings highlight the role of cognitive load and attentional allocation in shaping modality-dependent vocabulary use. The study provides empirical support for integrating both oral and written content-based tasks in EFL instruction and offers practical implications for designing task-based assessments that promote vocabulary development.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">task-based language teaching</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">vocabulary development</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">oral and written modalities</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">content-based instruction</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">EFL learners</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">cognitive SLA</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/download/198/245</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
