Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences 3092-717X 1 Serial Number 3 2023 07 01 A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Student Acceptance of Peer Review in Classroom Settings A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Student Acceptance of Peer Review in Classroom Settings 1 9 EN Journal Article 2023 05 13 <p>This study aims to explore the key psychological, social, and contextual factors that influence students’ acceptance of peer review practices in university classroom settings. A qualitative research design was employed using semi-structured interviews with 20 university students from Tehran, selected through purposive sampling. Participants represented diverse academic disciplines and were chosen based on their prior engagement with peer review activities in their coursework. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using NVivo software. The analysis followed a three-stage coding process: open coding to identify initial concepts, axial coding to categorize subthemes, and selective coding to establish overarching themes. Three major themes emerged from the data: (1) Perceived credibility of peer feedback, which included students’ judgments about peer expertise, feedback objectivity, and the usefulness of structured review formats; (2) Emotional and social responses, such as fear of negative judgment, the role of interpersonal relationships, and the emotional impact of criticism; and (3) Educational context and implementation, highlighting the importance of instructor involvement, peer review training, timing of feedback, and the overall classroom culture. Participants emphasized that trust in the process and reviewer was central to accepting feedback, and emotional safety significantly shaped their willingness to engage with peer evaluations. Student acceptance of peer review is shaped by a complex interplay of cognitive evaluations, emotional reactions, and institutional design. Trust, clarity, and support emerged as critical facilitators of acceptance. These findings suggest that effective peer review implementation requires training, instructor moderation, and the cultivation of a feedback-positive classroom environment.</p> https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/download/19/13