<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3092-717X</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 13</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>The Effect of Reading and Vocabulary Intervention within the Test Validity on Vocabulary Learning Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>The Effect of Reading and Vocabulary Intervention within the Test Validity on Vocabulary Learning Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>13</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/japes.151</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>20205</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>04</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;Because intervention within the test validity as a dynamic assessment (DA)-laden procedure has been newly proposed by scholars in the field, research scarcity is there as far as this procedure is concerned with in EFL research. The present investigation focused on exploring the influence of reading and vocabulary intervention within the test validity on EFL learners’ strategies of vocabulary learning through a quasi-experimental pre-test post-test control group design. Three intact classes of intermediate female EFL learners, each composed of 30 learners, participated in this investigation from a private language institution in Tehran through convenience sampling. To collect the data, Quick Placement Test (QPT), and Vocabulary Learning Strategies Survey (VLSS) were utilized. To analyze the data, One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used. It was shown that reading and vocabulary intervention within the test validity had a significant effect on vocabulary learning strategies among Iranian EFL learners. Moreover, there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of reading and vocabulary intervention within the test validity on vocabulary learning strategies in favor of the vocabulary intervention within the test validity. These results offer practical insights for language teachers, learners, and curriculum developers.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Reading intervention within the test validity</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">vocabulary intervention within the test validity</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">vocabulary learning strategies</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/download/151/159</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
